In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or negative development?
Certainly, it is a fact that a growing number of Hypermarkets has been opened in the past few years, which are attracting more people to shop there. Due to these recent changes, many small native shops have to shut the business and have suffered losses. However, this change has also brought many other opportunities to the small vendors, which I am going to discuss in this essay.
On the one hand, big shopping malls provide a range of products under one roof. A person has not to go far at different shops to do shopping for various items. For example, one can buy toys, clothes, groceries, medicines, fruits and vegetables, and many more at a single place in the supermarkets. However, this comfort is not given by the local shops. The public has to go to different stores for the shopping of different categories of items. Additionally, megastores also provide the comfort of shopping in any season, namely rainy, summer, or winter, without the season's adverse impact on health. For above these reasons supermarkets seem more lucrative to the people.
On the other hand, people from less privileged backgrounds cannot use these large shopping centres. Thus, they go to the small native shops for their shopping and it provides opportunities for local vendors to price their items for every wage group of people. Indeed, the local shops do not have much money to rent a space in the hypermarkets, but definitely, they can use the marketing ideas of megastores to look appealing in very similar ways. For instance, marketing ideas such as, various promotional offers and schemes, different price ranges for all income groups, and various brands and better quality of items for better word of mouth.
To conclude, megastores provide facility to shop different product categories under one roof as well as it gives the comfort of shopping in every season. Not to forget that it also creates many job opportunities for the native people. However, this is not the case with local shops, but local vendors can use the marketing ideas of supermarkets to expand their presence. Therefore, in my view, the positive developments of supermarkets outweigh the negative developments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03314917127 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72496135104 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2229895568 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331437590937 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107116249598 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694889127159 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214107973544 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183531181223 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.