Some people say that in all levels of education, from Primary School to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Teaching theories and hard skills by the education system is very commonly known since we were young. It is also mistaken by some that the education institutes are not engaging us in learning practical skills, such as sports, or soft skills. I formerly disagree with the letter viewpoint.
To begin with, gone are those days, when universities were only focusing on hard skills of subjects, such as science, politics and history because, in today's era, practical skills are equally important to learn, and hence, schools have started to introduce them. Nowadays, a growing number of tertiary educations are concentrating on soft skills, namely behaviour communication and leadership skills. For example, recently my younger sister's school has started to arrange a workshop on soft skills every weekend. It will certainly enhance and boost the confidence of future workers.
Furthermore, learning practical aspects is very crucial in day to day life, as it adds numerous advantages to the careers; playing sports or managing financial savings to name a few. Many sports legends are live examples for choosing practical skills, mainly sports, over learning facts or theories; and it would not be possible without the help of schools and universities, where they have studied. To further illustrate, I started to manage my finance, when I started earning, and it would not happen if I were not taught of it in my graduation.
To conclude, it is true that a decade ago educational Institutes were only organised for the subjects. However, currently, an increasing number of schools and universities are realising the benefits of practical skills, thus generating more future leaders. At present, the education system helps to choose a career based either on practical or theories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sports, over learning facts or theories; and it would not be possible without the...
^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sing number of schools and universities are realising the benefits of practical skills, thus ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31802120141 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84188144145 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9515521293 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195876029932 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633003895317 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441034789785 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121829524397 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225793508684 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.