In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.
Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that nowadays people are opting for the shopping malls for buying their needs which lead to the stoppage of local markets in neighboring. While the drawbacks of closing the small markets seem to be harmful, I believe that the benefits are more noteworthy.
On the one hand, the closure of small shopping markets could bring many difficulties for the owners. In fact, the stoppage of such businesses puts an enormous strain on the shopkeepers to fulfill their basic necessities. As a result, unemployment would be a main consequence of closing small businesses. Also, the owners who have not any qualified competencies to go for other occupations might be at risk of committing crimes to accommodate their needs. Therefore, governments must be conscious about the removing of small businesses, even if it is productive for society.
On the other hand, I would argue that people’s desire to purchase in shopping complex rather local stores comprises various reasons. Firstly, finding a suitable place for parking a car in a hectic street is more likely to a challenging issue, leading to choose an up-to-date shopping center with a spacious roofed area. At the same time, the traffic congestion and noise pollution could be increasingly curtailed in the streets in which main local shops has placed. Consequently, not only are these modern complexes extremely time-saving for people in purchasing different purposes, other facilities such as cinemas, food courts and theme parks for children would be more preferable to pick out such places.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the closure of local businesses due to people’s preference for huge shopping centers, is likely more effectiveness for community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ain on the shopkeepers to fulfill their basic necessities. As a result, unemployment would be a m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26714801444 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99585920228 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595667870036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5058294844 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166328035005 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687294000823 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383944223297 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109671175133 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287466429171 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.