School children should learn local history rather than world history. Do you agree or disagree?
There is no harm in saying that given topic attracts immediate attention owing to it's versatility. There are two dimensions of this topic. One group of people is of the opinion that school children should only study local history, while other group of people asserts on the view point that both local and international studies are of utmost importance. I completely disagree that students should only learn local studies as with this their level of knowledge would be limited to domestic level only. Let's discuss this school of thought in more detail to strengthen out view point.
To begin with, there has been an enormous focus on historical studies worldwide. Undoubtedly, the focus is rightly put. In early education children should learn about historical event the world had came across. By knowing the historic culture, values & sacrifices, students would be able to realize the importance of high living standards they are provided. By understanding and reviewing the living standards people had, they would be able to give due respect to environment and nature.
To elucidate this view point further, by leaning international history, students will be able to understand the geographical distribution, diversified culture across the globe. By learning local history would not give the student the opportunity to analyze and compare and will minimize their scale of learning.
To conclude the aforementioned mentioned argument, it is quite essential for students to wider their leaning scale & learn about different historical events & cultures around the world in order to analyze and be more knowledgeable person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ould be limited to domestic level only. Lets discuss this school of thought in more ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...rn about historical event the world had came across. By knowing the historic culture...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38976377953 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83277568589 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586614173228 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8590734938 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18204661017 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056858515668 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067444861748 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995150287018 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047004701533 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.