Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them, while others believe that this won’t work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The concept of junk food is flourishing by leaps and bound which increase the morbidity ratio across the globe. To control the situation some people consider awareness as the sole solution whereas others believe that heavy tax on unhealthy food and inversely subsidised rate on healthy items will better serve the purpose. This essay will discuss both views in details before reaching to any opinion.
To embark on, junk food is the root cause of various diseases such as obesity, hypertension and diabetes. People are less aware of fatal effects of such food on health consequently, consume these food in large portion which make themselves ill. According to research conducted in 2017 by WHO, World Health Organisation concludes that public awareness session on healthy diet and adverse effects of junk food has decreased the consumption by 25% in USA and compounding this ratio will be double by next year due to increase number of participants. Thus, it is clear that awareness is the key to change people's habit.
On contrary, is educating people for adverse effects of junk food is enough? Ofcourse not. Even the cigarette advertisement conveys that it is injurious to health but despite this people consume it. So as, with junk food. Increasing tax on such items and subsidising the healthy food will also motivate people to grab healthy food over junk food. Such practice was followed in Australia where tax on junk food increased by 20%. People withdraw to consume these foods and switch to healthy food. The argument that heavy taxes on junk food will better serve the purpose can not be debunked.
To conclude, health is remain the primary concern for people. The tug of war between healthy and junk food is constant. However, awareness might deter people to intake such food along with taxation on junk food and subsidy on healthy food would also benefit the people as a whole. In my opinion, it is predicted that Government has to take multiple initiatives together which would result in healthy nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ch food on health consequently, consume these food in large portion which make themselves ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...ording to research conducted in 2017 by WHO, World Health Organisation concludes th...
^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t it is injurious to health but despite this people consume it. So as, with junk foo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... be debunked. To conclude, health is remain the primary concern for people. The tug...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, so, thus, whereas, as to, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0118694362 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52101557948 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537091988131 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5934655323 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337098660449 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121045810519 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660943705955 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228921238448 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431980135496 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.