Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Essay topics:

Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is widely believe that the individuals who are genius of science and technology are considered valued more in the contemporary society than the individuals who belong to music and art industry. I completely agree with the statement because scientist and technology specialist creates different invention and they have vast career and they are being paid with high remuneration and perquisites.

To begin with, scientists and technology experts are the individual who creates various technological inventions .As science and technological inventions are vital for any society and without technological invention, societies cannot sustain. So they often more venerated in their society. For Example, scientists like Graham Bell and Albert Einstein are still remembered and respected because of their contribution to the society. This is because of their contribution for the society.

In addition to this, scientists and technology experts have lengthy career till they get retired. In other words, their service is being utilised till they reach the superannuation age. To elaborate this, they often serve to private and public sector which requires them to work for at least 25-30 years. So, if any individual who has long and stable career ought to get more respect in his surroundings. Furthermore, they get high salary and perks compare to other member of the society. As a result, they are valued more in their society.

In conclusion, individuals from science and technology are always valued more compare to the arts and music industry individuals because they create new inventions and they have more financial stability in their career.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
It is widely believe that the individuals who are genius of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... is widely believe that the individuals who are genius of science and technology are co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...creates various technological inventions .As science and technological inventions ...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...eates various technological inventions .As science and technological inventions ar...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, still, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53125 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92122475636 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9077634146 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159475123328 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628449453001 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423246516602 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111205523258 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280560220084 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.