Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Global warming is undoubtedly a major global concern today. I concur with the statement that the international community should make more efforts towards solving these problems rather than accepting and living with it. This essay will elaborate my perspective in detail.
The depletion of ozone layer is the main reason for global warming and consequently leading to a series of unprecedented events which results in a major climate change. The emission of carbon resulting in disruption of these protective atmospheric layers is a contribution from technologies used all over the world. Hence, the collaborative ventures among international bodies is a mandate to tackle such issues. The developed nations, for example, can utilise their savants and scientists to invent environment friendly technologies, like usage of solar panels to generate energy, and share them with developing countries at lower rates to encourage its usage.
Another solution is to save what is left. In other words taking care of natural resources and using renewable sources of energy is a second road to consider. For instance, growing more trees can help curb these problems, but planting a tree or a garden is not a solution. However a large scale project involving activities like forests restoration and green infrastructure is likely to contribute significantly if such practices are accepted across the borders.
All in all, it is clear that there is no silver bullet to these burning issues. Certainly, a joint venture and more effective international policies are yet to be implemented to gain the fruitful results in the future to deal with the threats of global warming and its dangerous repercussions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...g a tree or a garden is not a solution. However a large scale project involving activit...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n infrastructure is likely to contribute significantly if such practices are acce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37078651685 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02712560995 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670411985019 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2389934663 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154554711526 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470252569001 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047738498616 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892424501736 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379479066802 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.