Social Media has helped us increase our virtual networks. This has isolated us physically, making us socially awkward in person.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
The physical interaction has become bizzare, leaving us alone due to the proliferation of the online connections with the assistance of social platforms. I concur with the given assertion. This essay shall elucidate the deleterious impacts such as uncomfortable communications and social anxiety due to the advent of the internet friendships.
To begin with, people do not prefer talking face-to-face and find it challenging to impart thoughts in person. The heavily rely on chatting that they feel weird talking to anyone offline; thus, they prefer to dwell inside the house so they would not face anyone. Moreover, a conversation between students in schools and universities has dramatically plunged, because of which, befriending people offline is arduous these days. For instance, learners in learning institutions do not know their classmates but do know many people on social sites.
Furthermore, the dependence on social media networks has led people to social fears. Individuals are afraid of talking to each other in the real life because of lack of offline conversations. Besides, employees find it onerous to interact with their peers; consequently, they fail to be effective at the workplace. To illustrate, speakers are diffident and hesitate while demonstrating a presentation in front of clients that lead to loss of crucial deals and business objectives. Therefore, virtual connections afflict human beings to deal with social anxieties and ineffective communication skills.
In conclusion, social world has made our lives facile by intensifying our web networking. However, such technology has inflicted an absence of confidence and fear of social interactions in an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imparting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: imparting
...ng face-to-face and find it challenging to impart thoughts in person. The heavily rely on...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60852713178 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20338226774 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8721425572 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181429810899 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569220710457 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614871389351 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102839265563 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313582040539 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.