Some governments spend a lot of public money training individuals to be successful in international sporting events. Some people believe that this money should be spent on things that will benefit the general public instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the past decade, international sporting events, such as olympics and world cups. have increased enormously. Governments spend money on training athletes to win competitions. However, some people argue that the funds used to train players should be invested on things that will help individuals of nations. I partially agree with this assertion because games are crucial but needs of general public deserve equal importance.
Sports play a significant role in the development of a country and individuals because they foster people to work hard for a game, and sports also aid the nation economically. When people participate in a championship and win it, they represent their country which becomes popular due to the victories. Such achievements encourage others to develop a feeling for a particular sport, they might want to play to grow and accomplish their goals. Moreover, sporting events attract huge audience to visit the stadiums to watch the match that result in earning money by selling tickets, To illustrate, The Commonwealth Games, 2010 sold more than 3 million tickets that helped the government to raise funds for the championship. Therefore, taxes on tickets can help the nation to sustain the finanical condition, or even improve it.
The major source of income for nations is money collected from public as taxes on various goods and services that should be spent to benefit people. In many countries, there is an absence of quality education, and schools and colleges are not available at many places. For instance, many countrysides in India do not have educational instituions for children to study and become successful. Besides, citizens in developing countries do not have enough money for treatments; thus, they live a problematic life. Goverments should also consider the essence of living a normal life as a critical aspect and should use the money to provide amenities people need. For example, providing surgeries at a reasonable cost, and organizing free health check-ups in villages would help people to live a ill-free life.
Although, spending on training players for international sporting events cannot be ignored, governments should also understand the importance of investing funds on people's betterment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Have
...vents, such as olympics and world cups. have increased enormously. Governments spend...
^^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... because games are crucial but needs of general public deserve equal importance. Sports pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...ial but needs of general public deserve equal importance. Sports play a significan...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 789, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s in villages would help people to live a ill-free life. Although, spending on...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38526912181 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91058531459 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614730878187 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1230245533 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.823529412 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292529130844 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851044708541 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081596597284 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197179502203 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969982040438 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.