Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills. What are the causes? Suggest possible solutions.
Cooperation is an important base for the success of any corporate company. Lack of it can hamper the growth of the business. There is a tendency to combat it with the best possible solution; hence, I am of the opinion that with the effective measures, this situation can be improved.
There are a number of causative factors for the lack of interpersonal skills. One of them is that people do not respect others. This is because they feel they are superior compared to others, as they are new to the system. It is important to note that such people are mostly focused on their own personal growth as they are new, due to which they hesitate to involve others for any decision-making. My office friend, for instance, who has newly joined, was assigned a marketing project which he failed to complete on time. He thought discussing about it with others may lead to sharing the incentives, so he deprived himself from gaining the advice by coordinating with other experts in the office.
There are many steps with which we can deal with this problem effectively. Firstly, businesses must consider arranging an welcome training on regular basis to help the new employees understand the importance of these skills, and they must be given some background about the different success-stories in the organisation. Besides, Human Resource department must make sure to inculcate the values of respect, sharing and caring through regular meetings. Mangers in the systems must motivate everyone to think about the growth of the company and not thinking about an individual’s growth. Last but not the least, companies can aspire to arrange events where employees can take part to prove work from their areas. Such events enforce team building, and it will bring people together for a common goal. In my company, for example, a corporate event is organised every year which enables different departments to showcase their areas of expertise though different project work. Due to this everyone in the team ensures to help others and seek advice in all the walks of work. This has also helped many employees to get rid of their superiority complex, as they get to experience the potentials in the others.
To conclude, from the above discussions, I see a great improvement in such a situation on developing interpersonal skills provided the aforementioned measures are taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tly, businesses must consider arranging an welcome training on regular basis to he...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04071246819 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85437893475 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552162849873 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8260686701 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.263157895 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143658262125 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418438560561 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450235881083 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848395201352 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135355235332 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.