Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills. What are the causes? Suggest possible solutions.
Cooperation is an important base for the success of any corporate company. Lack of it can hamper the growth of the business. There is a tendency to combat it with the best possible solution; hence, I am of the opinion that with the effective measures, this situation can be improved.
There are a number of causative factors for the lack of interpersonal skills. One of them is that people do not respect each other. This is because they feel they are superior compared to others. It is important to note that such individuals are mostly focused on their own personal growth due to which they hesitate to involve others in any decision-making. My office friend, for instance, was once assigned a marketing project which he failed to complete on time, as he thought discussing about it with others may lead to sharing the incentives. He deprived himself from gaining the expertise by coordinating with other experts in the office.
There are many steps with which we can deal with this problem effectively. Firstly, businesses must consider arranging an interpersonal training on regular basis to help their employees realise the importance of different skills that play a vital role in the growth of their organisation. Besides, Human Resource department must ensure to inculcate the values of respect, sharing and caring through regular meetings. Mangers in the systems must motivate everyone to think about the growth of the company rather than thinking about an individual’s growth. Last but not the least, companies can aspire to arrange events where different group of people participate to demonstrate work from their areas. Such events enforce team building, team bonding and it will bring people together for a common goal. In my company, for example, a corporate event is organised every year which enables different departments to showcase their areas of expertise though different project work. Due to this everyone in the team ensure to help each other and seek others advice in all the walks of work. This has also helped many employees to get rid of their superiority complex, as they get to experience the potentials in others.
To conclude, from the above discussions, I see a great improvement in such a situation on developing interpersonal skills provided the aforementioned measures are taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 608, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t not the least, companies can aspire to arrange events where different group of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15831134565 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91295026951 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554089709763 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8548706263 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.894736842 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129706764883 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396691401955 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502474442495 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787430890167 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150917931588 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.