Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views.
It is argued that teenagers are beneficial to have a part-time job while others are not. In this essay, I will discuss both views of this arguement.
First of all, some people think that it is an advantage for teens to have a casual job because they can understand the value of money. This means teenagers involve in a working condition to learn how the money to be earned and they can understand that how their parents earn the money to grow them up. It is also a good chance to educate youngs the right concept of spending money. In addition, a part-time job give youngs an opportunity to pre-experienced the real world of society and help them to adopt the environment of working.
On the other hand, having a part-time job for teens is not a good idea as some people say so. The reasons might be the interruption on their study as some parents think teenager’s main job is go to school and focus on study. Doing part-time job might waste their time and give them a poor result for exams. However, I think time management plays an important role in this case. Teenagers can try to manage the time effectively to overcome the problem of resulting a bad score.
In conclusion, I believe that it is more advantages to put youngs in a working condition if they they can manage the time appropriately. As well as they can learn different things while away from school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: they
...to put youngs in a working condition if they they can manage the time appropriately. As w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57661290323 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66692646096 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520161290323 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1138018885 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3076923077 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271747462399 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106781350004 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939986763801 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17130040762 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822662709444 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.