In some countries people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of benefit. Some support this, others believe that this money should not be given. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there is a huge increase in the underemployed people <span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="people "></span> in the world. Providing a sum of moneny is an amazing way to encourage them. The salary paid for them is an advantage. The partial payment, will make them motivated and this could help them to meet their requirements partially. In addition to this, due to unemployment people might lead in an obnoxious way of life. As a result the criminal mentality of the people are increased in the country as per recent survey's made by the government. This activity is increasing due to poverty and unemployment. By providing them some grand partially we can help them.
Nonetheless, some people think differently and as receive the salary from the government, they might not search for other jobs. As a result the rate of unemployment could increase and it is a dangerous situation in the society.
Moreover, the chances of affording both, such as government grand as well as salary from the employer. As a result, really needed people are ignored.
In my opinion, the government should make an appropriate arrangements to restrict the unemployment. For example, the government can start new projects like developments in the tourism and transportation. Through this lot of people could get the job. Moreover, the government should arrest this crisis by improving the economic conditions in the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an obnoxious way" with adverb for "obnoxious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., due to unemployment people might lead in an obnoxious way of life. As a result the criminal menta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'arrangement'?
Suggestion: arrangement
...e government should make an appropriate arrangements to restrict the unemployment. For examp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt new projects like developments in the tourism and transportation. Through this...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35242290749 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.76209390373 2.80592935109 134% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550660792952 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9564523023 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9375 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1875 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175981322351 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562703581638 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375499891258 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990475379376 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311540802508 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.