In some countries, younger people are neglecting their right to vote.
What problems does this cause and what are some of the possible solutions?
Undoubtedly, a major portion of young population is not preferring to caste their votes in elections. Even though ignorance
on the part of youngsters to actively participate in the voting would proffer the chance of winning of ineligible candidates, still if
supremacy endow the opportunity to young leaders, they can gravitate the youth.
Since the young people are morrow of every nation and they are well aware about prevailing turmoil in the politics, thus they are considered as rational voters. Seemingly, the underprivileged countries where the majority of populace is young and lack of their participation would elect corrupt Politicians. Also, it is biased to overlook the fact documented by WHO that in India there is only 36 % voting by youth in polls which is intensify the prevailing plights. Therefore, in order to choose the eligible candidate it is essential for youngsters to put steps forward and use their voting rights to maintain healthy democracy.
Probing to next question, only motto of senior political parties is to grab the power of democracy, thus they do not introduce the young leaders in elections. Instead of following ideology and working style of elder politician the young people admire the young political leaders. As a result, when political parties nominates their senior party workers as candidates, the youngsters hesitate to be the party of politics and do not caste their votes. To exemplify, as per survey conducted by Times Magazine, in the gone calendar year, introduction of young and energetic politicians by 'Liberal Party' in Canada have enhanced the young voting rates.
In conclusion, although privation in the voting preference of youngsters leads to corrupt political leaders, if regimes welcome the youth leaders then it would surge the adult voting ratio.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ly, a major portion of young population is not preferring to caste their votes in elections. Even...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nning of ineligible candidates, still if supremacy endow the opportunity to young...
^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ery nation and they are well aware about prevailing turmoil in the politics, thus...
^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re is only 36 % voting by youth in polls which is intensify the prevailing plight...
^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'intensified'.
Suggestion: intensified
...36 % voting by youth in polls which is intensify the prevailing plights. Therefore, in o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aders in elections. Instead of following ideology and working style of elder poli...
^^
Line 7, column 610, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c politicians by Liberal Party in Canada have enhanced the young voting rates. ...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it would surge the adult voting ratio.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86975776544 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.2664005573 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.909090909 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941390284961 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404876077825 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242783714199 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477872849634 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299688025669 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.