Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Presently, the importance of learning a foreign language to survive in a globalized world has risen into prominence in many parts of world. That is why, there has been a growing body of opinion favouring primary school students to learn a exotic language instead of at secondary insitutions, while I am in consummate discord with it. Despite the many advantages that derive from this arrangment, I firmly opine that it is predominantly disadvantageous to the primary school students as it would act as deterrant to their holsitic development.
For one, although learning foreign language at primary school is a way to compete at global level by having deep understanding of another ligustic structures at young age, most student are likly to struggle to develop upto the potential. It is evident that at young age, children need enough time and energy to learn not only their own mother tongue, but also to adapt to society's morals, cutoms and values. Further, a primitive instance of this is exemplified by young pupils who already find it difficult to know everything about airthmatics, and extreme confusing concepts of history and science. If they are made to learn a brand new another language, they might not develop their cognitive abilites appropriately. Therefore, this is an implausible recommendation.
In addition, primary school teenagers feel intense pressure of adopting to a new language. This forceful learning can be a negative experience for them, deterring them to learn foreign lanagueg even in the future. A statistic was recently released demonstarting that forceful learning enviornment at teenage have caused many studnets to hate learning new things in adulthood, causing them to be unsuccessfull at times. Moreover, when students at secondary school learn these languages of foreign country, they develop camaraderie with learning atmosphere, and tend to show eagerness to learn more about it. Hence, this discussion clearly shows that it is optimal way to let secondary students to focus on learning of a foreign language rather than primary school students.
Following the look, inspite of the pros of giving more capabilities to be competitive in stiff globalized environemnt, addition of foreign language learning in primary curriculum has many more drawbacks than favourable points. I thus hope that human intelligence and ingenuity contiue to work work to lessen the burdens of young children of primary schools in the forseebale future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ouring primary school students to learn a exotic language instead of at secondary...
^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that it is predominantly disadvantageous to the primary school students as it wou...
^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...forceful learning enviornment at teenage have caused many studnets to hate learni...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...balized environemnt, addition of foreign language learning in primary curriculum ...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: work
...n intelligence and ingenuity contiue to work work to lessen the burdens of young children...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35384615385 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0034124795 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6062798036 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.2 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382624750327 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125912446605 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770544170653 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228930701837 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614426594368 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.