Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
People are dubious about whether foreign languages should be introduced to children at upbringing ages or not. On one side being multi linguistic is a quality, and on the other hand rests the stress graph of students. I would like to agree with the fact that learning varied languages do have more benefit than the negatives.
children with the knowledge of optional languages have a vast array of job opportunities. Philanthropist’s around the world are moving towards achieving the goal of equality for children round the globe. In this era it becomes vital for students to learn these languages to accommodate themselves in this competitive world. To exemplify, an interviewer at the french embassy would be giving higher credentials to a candidate who is withstanding experience in french language. To my view, there are a million reasons to add languages at an early stage.
While many believe that the education system for student has a strict regime. Pressure of various languages can often end students being perplexed in all languages. Few developed nations have already started with giving mathematics as an optional subject. this enables a child to select his/her career being a minor and focusing only on his or her interest.
Comprehending the stress of acquiring a new language, I still feel that experts should focus on making the courses available, either optional or compulsory at younger ages for individuals, for them to get habitual and capable for the struggle of life. I completely agree that focusing on foreign language is a vast ocean of opportunity for students and the disadvantages correlated are minimal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...ress graph of students. I would like to agree with the fact that learning varied languages do have more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
... more benefit than the negatives. children with the knowledge of optional language...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ing mathematics as an optional subject. this enables a child to select his/her caree...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25283018868 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03688960438 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1672116689 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220214201944 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704783723689 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482015918664 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126711799393 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389554123281 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.