Some parents buy and allow their children anything they as or want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have on children as they grow older?
It is believed that few parents do not abide their children in the boundaries of cravings and fulfill every desire of them. This is not a good nurturing of children because of various reasons and on top of that it will create perilous eventualities for them within the course of time.
To commence with, children will not understand the value of things they will get. In other words, they will take evey precious thing for granted as they know that it will be made available easily by their parents. In addition to that, not only the value the importance of money will also not be understood by them. For example, if they break a toy of exorbitant amount then, they will not care about it because they know that it will be given to them. Additionally, they will start conflicts with parents, if their parents refuse to purchase the things. Apart from this, demands for each and every thing will be augmented by them. Hence, it can be substantiated that it is not a good way to bring up children.
Furthermore, children will have to face numerous repurcussions as they grow older. First and foremost negative implication is that they will be astrayed by their desires. This is because, at older age, if they fail to procure the things, they want then illegal ways will be followed in order to grab desired things. To illustrate, some children as they become old, gradually develop a violent or criminal nature due to fulfill their desires. Moreover, because of their mindsets of getting things easier, adolescents will be disturbed mentally as well as irrisponsible for each and every thing. So these all are the consequences that children are going to face at old age.
In conclusion, fulfilling all the desires of their descendants is not a good way of nurturing and it will have bad effect on them in future. So, it is recommended that parents should start treating their children in a way that it will be proven beneficial for them in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ing and it will have bad effect on them in future. So, it is recommended that parents sho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...t it will be proven beneficial for them in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73313782991 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62398622404 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49853372434 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4331304392 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.9411764706 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311222304423 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124709171248 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640974184887 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217126335072 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460023048261 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.