Some people are making new friends by socializing network websites and internet chat rooms. Some people say that this is a good thing. Other people opine that people should make new friends by face to face chat. Discuss both views and given your own opinion.
There is an increase in those who utilize social media networks to found new friends, but some individuals are arguing that new friendships should be bonded In real life and in a face-to-face situation. Although we are living in an internet-dominated world, I personally side with the latter view. In this essay, I would discuss both views and conclude.
On one hand, finding fresh friends online has some benefits. Firstly, it is not difficult and time consuming. People can connect with each other in no time without any limitation on when and where they want to chat. For instance, They do not need an open cafe to hang out. Secondly, it is not restricted by national boundaries, they can connect with any person in the globe without even moving out of their home. Thirdly, people with the same point of view or interest are most likely to follow each other on social networks like Facebook, or Instagram. This gives them a better start to talk and click.
On the other hand, despite all the benefits that come with an online friend, it could be dangerous and harmful as well. Cybercrimes are increasing all over the world thank to these social network websites. As all the connections with an online friend are through the internet, which could be a fake profile running by a criminal. We are hearing a plethora of credit card hacks and other crimes that are happening via these websites. Furthermore, it is a common view that real friends are those who can be there when you need them. Friends who have face-to-face relationship always has a deeper bond and can be there for you in thick and thin. Also, these friendships tend to last longer.
To sum up, I strongly believe real-life friends are a better choice. Despite that, we all have some online friends and they could be beneficial, at the end of the day we call a real friend if we are in trouble.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... fake profile running by a criminal. We are hearing a plethora of credit card hacks and oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68085106383 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60429391586 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6135083896 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0526315789 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24084999457 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064316932701 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543625699835 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141138648801 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480483897806 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.