Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Many people argue that accomplishments in sports branches come with the natural born abilities, and others believe that practising and being hardworking are the most significant elements to become successful at a sport. In my opinion, even though, talent, which enables people to have better coordination of their organs, consists a vital part for the success, it is not sufficient unless it is mixed with hardwork which ensures sportspeople to have sustainable achievements.
First and foremost, natural abilities, especially the consistency between the body parts, allow the individuals to have superiority among others in sports. This is because success at a sport comes with the dominance of an individual over his/her opponent, hence it can be achieved with quick body movements, such as kicking a ball with agility or passing to the team member rapidly. To this end, these features play a tremendous part in the achievements in sports branches. To illustrate, Brazilian people tend to play football in a better sense than other nations, thus they have won the most Fifa World Cup titles in men’s branch with their durability,agile fundamentals and they have perfect leg and foot coordination which are all key for the success in football. However, these qualifications are not enough to become successful at sports since sportspeople should combine their discipline and hardwork with their talent in order to become victorious. Consequently, even though talent gives clear advantages to the sportspeople, sustainable accomplishments in sports activities come with practising and working hard.
On the other hand, practising in a subject regularly makes people to do it perfect. Considering this, training for the sport, being disciplined while getting ready for the match and staying persistent for the obejctives create perfect results at sports. Nevertheless, having a talent for the subject could boost the success but it is not totally compulsory. For instance, Michael Jordan, who is the most admired basketball player in the world, was not accepted to the highschool basketball team due to his short height and not having talent. After a while, he practised abundantly every day and combined his genetic, naturally born, advantages such as having a high stamina and swiftness with his hardwork which paid off as he became the most successful basketball player on earth. As a result, working continously with focusing on the targets results in victory in sports, however, the effects of talent should not be neglected.
To sum up, people can be successful at sports if they put their hardwork and persistency on the table, though natural ability is clearly a positive matter that aids people to become successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , agile
... men's branch with their durability,agile fundamentals and they have perfect leg ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 431.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37587006961 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99453190366 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53596287703 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1204420371 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.466666667 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7333333333 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200237885975 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766641520101 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629028003307 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155305602639 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052680574129 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.