Some people believe that government should spend money in railways rather than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people believe that government should spend money in railways rather than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, railways have been emerging as one of the most popular methods to carry goods as well as people from one place to another. Whereas some people believe that focus should be shifted from roads to railway, I would argue that while such investment is necessary, we should also maintain and improve road infrastructure.

One of the most significant benefits of trains that they are much more efficient and dependable as well as are less affected by weather conditions and traffic jams. Furthermore, trains are able to fit up to more than 1 thousand people as well as tonnes of goods at the same time, which reduces the cost of the long-distance delivery of goods and the commutation of human beings. Trains are programmed the same speed and time for one route with high reliability and punctuality, which helps people save time effectively to estimate time for dispatching and receiving goods as well as to speed up journey time for travelling.

On the other hand, it is common knowledge that that this kind of transport lacks flexibility and convenience as the route and time cannot be adjusted. This is because each train is tied to a particular track, meaning that so they cannot provide door to door services. This results in the fact that the train has to stop at scheduled stations in order to let more people in rather than stopping at anywhere they would like.

In conclusion, although railways plays a significant role in public transportation system and should be , I believe that we should take both rails and roads into consideration in government budget.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tonnes of goods at the same time, which reduces the cost of the long-distance de...
^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of the long-distance delivery of goods and the commutation of human beings. Tra...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e with high reliability and punctuality, which helps people save time effectively...
^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... the other hand, it is common knowledge that that this kind of transport lacks flexibilit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...blic transportation system and should be , I believe that we should take both rail...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93632958801 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77422299213 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.0776371905 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.444444444 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141540413655 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571730373453 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583681121692 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953293676576 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553465927705 0.056905535591 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.