Some people believe that government should spend money in railways rather than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, railways have been emerging as one of the most popular method to carry goods/ people from one please to another. Whereas some people believe that rails should be invested more than roads, I would argue that while it is necessary, we should also maintain and improve road infrastructure.
one of the most significant benefits of rail transportation is that it is much faster and more dependable as well as it is least affected by weather condition and traffic jams. Furthermore, railway can carry larger volume over greater distance that makes it become more economical for long distance. Trains were programmed the same speed and time for one route so punctual that it helps people saving time effectively to estimate time for dispatching and receiving goods as well as to speed up journey time for travelling.
On the other hand, it is vital that this kind of transport is lack of flexibility and convenient when route and times cannot be adjusted. The reason for that it has been tied to a particular track so they cannot provide door to door services. Consequently, it takes more another arrangements to deliver goods or carry people to final destination. For instance, although using motorbike causes many tragic accidents to people, majority of Vietnamese still prefer to use this type of vehicle in their daily routines because of its convenience
In conclusion, although railway plays a significant role in public transportation system that should be maintained and improved, I believe that we should take both rails and roads into consideration in government budget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ntain and improve road infrastructure. one of the most significant benefits of rai...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to consideration in government budget.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, so, still, well, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15444015444 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87511824365 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.5568227204 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.333333333 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 7.06120827912 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130589658908 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050561596979 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647523833984 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950393694286 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782097321667 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.