It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views
Some people are born with innate talent which helps them to learn things fast and become competent at those skills, especially at sport and music. Somehow, excellence in those fields does not necessarily require gifted talents as training might prove efficiency. This essay will consider both aspects and I would argue that effort and practice are keys to the most prodigies' success.
Some people have demonstrated that the inheritance of talents is true, which is also scientifically correct. Some characteristics as well as the information of the successors can be transmitted based on the regulations of DNA information from the previous generation. In contrast, in the history of music and sport in the world, there are merely persons born as genius, even not originating from art and sport family/without having an art background. For instance, Lady Gaga, whose affinity for music comes to her mind naturally, was born in a family which is of no relation to music or art.
However, I believe that people can sharpen their skills without being gifted one. If they are willing to dedicate their time to studying more skills as well as undergoing training with frequent practice, they can become even more successful than talented person. Nowadays, some institutes have been established to both recognize talent at an earlier stage of a child’s life and train/nurture untalented one to become expert in the field they want to learn, such as sport and music. For instance, most people aren’t aware that Mozard had been in training by his father who had motivated him to a higher level before he started to perform before audience.
To sum up, being gifted with talent is a luck of a person and good opportunity in their life. However, it is practice and effort that determine success the most rather than talents alone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prodigies'' or 'prodigy's'?
Suggestion: prodigies'; prodigy's
...ffort and practice are keys to the most prodigies success. Some people have demonstra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her mind naturally, was born in a family which is of no relation to music or art....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, for instance, in contrast, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08580858086 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78590865245 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587458745875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0035357113 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26012570937 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856219936132 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522063915434 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14675671081 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428492104579 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.