Some people believe that if an individual behaves in an antisocial manner, such as committing a crime, then society is to blame. What are the causes of antisocial behaviour? Who do you think is responsible?
It is often supported by the group of people that behaviour has a huge influence of society, and sometime it may also lead to anti-social activities by harming other people around them. However, in my opinion, society has a very small role to play in it but it is largely depend upon a person's own self and how he has been brought up by his family. This essay will discuss the reasons in detail and lead towards a plausible conclusion.
One of the major reasons of a person behaving in an antisocial way is the excessive use of technology. As, there are plenty of websites which affect them negatively, therefore, they tend to commit crimes, such as burglary, shoplifting, and robbery. Owing to their lack of emotional attachment with the other members of society. For instance, it has been seen that the individual who prefer to stay alone and avoid being a part of any group are more likely to show anti-social behaviour.
Moving head, I believe a person's upbringing has a great role to play in it. If, he was not taken care off properly or has not given the proper guidance then there are more chances of showing the cold behaviour. As, in general these individuals do not have empathy for others, and are always ready to do anything which will be beneficial for them but dangerous for others. Thus, one's brought up and moral values are very essential, otherwise, it will negatively affect the society.
In summary, I opine by saying that, as I discussed the reasons and the responsible person behind the anti-social behaviour of a person. It is crystal clear that it is not the society but the person's own people that are blamed for their antisocial behaviour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ll role to play in it but it is largely depend upon a persons own self and how he has ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...lay in it but it is largely depend upon a persons own self and how he has been brought up...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an antisocial way" with adverb for "antisocial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the major reasons of a person behaving in an antisocial way is the excessive use of technology. As,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it has been seen that the individual who prefer to stay alone and avoid being a p...
^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... behaviour. Moving head, I believe a persons upbringing has a great role to play in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in general, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7337883959 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64416807893 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9081599856 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187006534503 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594986074458 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610783037731 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109525135739 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468103865541 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.