Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is often seen that people have different opinions about friendships. Some of them believe that two like-minded friends will always have each others back, while others disagree. Although a contrasting view of a friend is useful sometimes, I think two friends of the same thoughts hold strong relationships.
On the one hand, it is true to say that people with similar viewpoints will always have a better understanding. In other words, in this type of friendship, the individuals have more similar interests and they have plenty of things to discuss. As a result, they share everything without worrying about being judged by other mates. Moreover, it has also seen that these people have fewer trust issues owing to their stronger bond that they share with each other. For example, childhood friendships mostly stay longer than other friendships that take place in later life, this is due to their same personality and choices.
On the other hand, opposers have different views as they consider that it is very crucial to show the reality to their close ones. To be clear, friends should speak their mind, no matter how harsh the truth is, and give their honest opinion. Despite the fact, whether one likes it or not. To illustrate, if a close friend will tell the flaws that his partner is doing then it eliminates the chances of committing mistakes, and shows real friendship. Thus, it is necessary to make different opinions to improve one another.
In conclusion, from my perspective, two individuals having similar interests hold their friendship more strongly and always support each other in their thick and thin, which has more importance than those who have different opinions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07857142857 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62125340014 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6089585585 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33788612829 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109923888724 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732950973129 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203969535928 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104326712184 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.