Some people believe that the media is responsible for violence in society.
Do you agree or disagree?
The role of the media in giving birth to violence in society is irrefutable. I completely agree with this notion, not only because of news bulletins that are full of loath, and fighting video game challenges but also because of the dramas that are not appropriate for viewers of all ages.
Firstly, the factor that compelled me to agree with this statement is that news that is on-aired on television are malicious. As the media is prone to be easily bribed and used to gain personal benefits, the news broadcasted is influence paddled to speak against competitors. Take an example of CNN America, which was responsible for cultivating abhorrence among the nation for the Republican party’s candidate. Hence, fake news on television spread violence in society.
Secondly, computer games have completely ruined the constructive behaviour of the younger generation. As children kept themselves engaged all day long with these fighting challenges, which has created chaos and anarchy in society, besides this, they also try to apply these techniques to their siblings. For instance, in India, where an electronic game addict was accused of killing younger brother while playing the Grand theft auto game. Thus, the media has diminished the border between right and wrong.
Finally, the content of the dramas is approved without being censored, which raises domestic violence and harassment. As dramas, these days are far from the reality due to which people are exposed to violence, and they try to implement what they watch on television.
To sum up, I completely agree with this statement. Not only because of dubious news and seasons, which are full of violence and inappropriate content, but also because of electronic games that affect a child’s behaviour.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30985915493 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78065366677 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0181661453 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16332399316 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565952337436 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361354776266 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878898147001 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405900575965 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.