Some people believe that only employees who have worked at a company for a long time deserve to be promoted to a higher position. What is your opinion about this?
The promotion is a common objective for every individuals, not only for internship but also any long time employee. Although experts believe that long-time employees deserve to be promoted to a higher position, I completely agree with this opinion rely on two reasons.
To begin with, no one can deny that this employee play a vital role for the improvement of the company that they have served. Which mean that they have a wide range of knowledge about most factor in these company, so they can bring up an efficient policy to contribute to the succesful of it. Moreover, when a firm get trouble on any circumstance, they always prove their loyalty by willing to stay here to help it to avoid being bankrupt. In fact, this level of loyalty rarely disappear in youngster as they want to gain as more experience. Therefore, these elder ones should be promoted to a higher role rely on the contribution of them.
Second, it is argue that there are many youngster who is participating in a lot of company. After coming there, they should be trained by veteran so that they know about both the culture of this firm and how they will work. Thus, It seems a best way to keep talent employee to work for this company, and they will become a vital staff after these old manpower retire. For instance, it is argue that most of leader in some huge company often start in the lowest role. Moreover, in this era, there are a number of talented employees hunt by varies company, so this older worker is able to protect them from being stolen by competitive firm.
To conclude, not only do they have an ernomous loyalty, but they are able to train the talented staff to maintain the reputation of this company. Considerably, I strongly believe that they need to rewared by any essensial method such as the promotion to a higher position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...range of knowledge about most factor in these company, so they can bring up an efficient poli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...he contribution of them. Second, it is argue that there are many youngster who is pa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun youngster seems to be countable; consider using: 'many youngsters'.
Suggestion: many youngsters
...em. Second, it is argue that there are many youngster who is participating in a lot of compan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'youngsters'?
Suggestion: youngsters
...Second, it is argue that there are many youngster who is participating in a lot of compan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... and how they will work. Thus, It seems a best way to keep talent employee to wor...
^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...ld manpower retire. For instance, it is argue that most of leader in some huge compan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6450617284 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54606059515 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558641975309 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1295622317 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298589963585 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104428618604 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735509164939 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197561093613 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978818392365 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.