Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
The issue of recycling of domestic waste has grown in importance over the past few decades. Some people are of the view that enforcing the law is the only method to increase recycling. Personally, I feel that legal legislation is effective, although there are supplementary methods, too.
There is no doubt that the homeowner would not separate their bins if there was any obligation. So that, governments should impose laws to punish offenders.
Turning to other methods, to encourage householders like by tax incentive, it is more possible that they are willing to differ from dry and solid waste. Moreover, increasing awareness about this process and revealing the detrimental effect of the lack of recycling motivate people to conserve nature. For example, the media can provide information about how to find an appropriate way to disposing rubbish. Finally, it should be considered that recycling factories play a key role in waste processing. Hence, the more these places use well-equipped systems, the more the home waste will be recycled. As a result, authorities should subsidize these factories to boost their performance.
Overall, it can be said that besides enforcing the law to more recycling other measures like awareness and using high-quality equipment in recycling factories should be taken. It seems to me that all factors besides each other are more powerful than merely strict rules.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i feel, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29464285714 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88080326011 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647321428571 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4248030241 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2307692308 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255661622429 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775303154358 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503613864949 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13459864118 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567651898694 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.