Some people consider price as the most important thing to think about when buying a product (such as cell phone) or service (e.g. medical treatment).
Do you agree or disagree?
Before dwelling into the easy, we must understand what price of a product comprise. Although most of the people are lured by high prices on product or in service, a section of people prioritize quality to price before availing any service or purchasing any product. I have mix feeling in about this notion, and will explain in my further paragraphs.
To embark on, an industry arrive on price tag of a specific product after calculating all factors such as R&D, manufacturing cost, advertisement cost and profit margin looking for, and so on. Most of the time, it is observed that costly items are superior in terms of quality and services. For instance, I-phone, the best smartphone in the world, is known for its service standard and quality product. Price of I-phone could had been lowered if manufacture would have wanted less profit. But, it might not be able to attract attentions as it does today. "One plus one", for example, is not considered as good as I-phone, although quality level is at par with I-phone, but not able raise their market share. Thus, we can say price tag matters to attract consumers.
However, there are several exceptions in this world, where we can find reasonability high quality standard at low price. To illustrate, AIMMS- a renowned hospital in India, most probably the best, offers medical service at extremely low rate; Cancer treatment can be done in just one lac of rupees, which is the lowest in the world. At the same time, there are several medical institutes, who cannot even think of providing diagnostic of Cancer in Rs. 1 lacs, forget about treatment. Furthermore, TCS - an IT giant in India, provide all aspects of IT services at reasonable low cost. Is TCS not earning profits? Is TCS losing market share due to low cost service? The answer is definite "NO"; their services are top class compare to other IT industries. Hence, it is not right to say that high price tag will deliver quality service.
To recapitulate, although most of the cases consumers are attracted by product prices, but there are exceptions that provide quality product and service at low cost. As a consumer, shouldn't we always compare product quality first before looking at the price tag, I believe, we should!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...quality product. Price of I-phone could had been lowered if manufacture would have ...
^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had wanted'?
Suggestion: had wanted
...e could had been lowered if manufacture would have wanted less profit. But, it might not be able ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...get about treatment. Furthermore, TCS - an IT giant in India, provide all aspects of ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...and service at low cost. As a consumer, shouldnt we always compare product quality first...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94225721785 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67967838414 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.994157815 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.15 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209284308432 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602464893696 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448622335674 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135750849321 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290684543163 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.