Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.
Do you agree or disagree?
Which other types of jobs should be highly paid?
Some portion of the public believes that the stars from entertainment industry or sports industry are paid abundantly. While, there are people who might negate this idea, but I strongly agree that they are paid heavily.
People who think they are paid in such so much have their own reasons. Firstly, the superfluous amounts of money which are paid to these entertainers are purely the consequence of their quality input. For instance, a film producer will pay his leading actor on basis of his previous performances, and his caliber of acting and fame. These film makers earn enormous amount of money in comparison to actors or actresses. Secondly, they put endless amount of hard work since their childhood to achieve success in their career. Such as, a career of a football player or any other sportsman has so much labor and hard work from their early childhood. They are only paid a plentiful amount of money when they play on big platform.
While, there are some other types of jobs which needs to be rewarded with good salaries as well. Safety is our foremost priority, and soldiers are directed to do so through out their career. Therefore, I believe soldiers should be paid more to raise their spirits and motivation. Moreover, pollution is having detrimental effects on every one life, so environmentalists should be paid handsome amount of salaries which will consequently contribute to more environmentalists in future.
To conclude, entertainers are paid tremendous amount of salaries, but there are other professions like soldiers and environmentalists which require huge increments on their salaries too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ity, and soldiers are directed to do so through out their career. Therefore, I believe sold...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ly contribute to more environmentalists in future. To conclude, entertainers are paid ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17803030303 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90041467777 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4828532227 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293774568311 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101524688967 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592001843519 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181294484579 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321497360415 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.