Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully. Others choose not to make any plans at all for free time. Compare the benefits of planning free-time activities with the benefits of not making plans. Which do you prefer? Planning or not planning for your leisure time?
How to spend our leisure time could sometimes be challenging. Many people are obsessed with their activities as everything should be planned. Others, however, opt to do their free time activities freely without any particular schedules. There are some benefits and also some drawbacks of this phenomenon which this essay will outline both views.
To begin with, should we pre-plan our free time, there will not be any confusion about what different types of exciting activities we are willing to do. In other words, it can be the most significant way of time management. Knowing exactly where to go or what to do can save plenty of time that can be spent on other tasks. Based on scientific researchers conducted in 2019 at Oxford University revealed that those who were well-organized and well-disciplined not only had more time to spend throughout the day but also were more concise and professional at their jobs.
However, this could have some drawbacks as well. One with obsessive time managing habit is known to be stressed out. This anxiety could grave a great risk for their health during the time. Although this group does everything in the so-called correct order, it comes with a price, which is not being able to enjoy the current moment fully. People who do not make plans are believed to savor life better than another group.
To conclude, whether we make plans for our free-time activities or not is a personal choice and has a direct connection with personality and lifestyle. Nonetheless, I take the side of the first group as I believe time management is the primary key to success.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91481481481 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70933204125 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5830889615 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349946245032 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106693794552 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815446114894 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21439210132 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541078901991 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.