The option of online grocery shopping has recently been introduced by hypermarkets. While many people have been inclining to shop their food online, some people have not accepted this technology and tend to do their food shopping traditionally by visiting the supermarket. This essay will discuss, although purchasing food online is convenient, why traditional shopping ultimately outweighs online shopping.
Online food shopping has undoubtedly become an appropriate way to food purchasing for people who have a hectic lifestyle. In this method, people can do their shopping trough one click and items will deliver to their doorsteps within a short period without they waste precious time. Furthermore, they no longer get stuck in heavy traffic and have more time to devote to significant activities. For examples, the results of a survey from people in metropolis illustrate that people with busy schedule tend to buy their food via internet way. On the whole, avoiding time waste provide a suitable occasion for shopping online to find its proponents.
On the other side, if there had been no time limitation for shopping, shopping experience would have been more satisfying. Traditional shopping provides the opportunity of walking through aisles and gives the right to choose fresh products to customers. For instance, results of an internet poll that consider by Walmart hypermarkets indicate that 70% of Americans costumers who do shopping traditionally are more contentment with their shopping. In sum up, if there is time to spend shopping, supermarket shopping can be a delightful experience.
Hypermarkets have lately presented online grocery shopping as an option. This essay will discuss why food shopping online is effortless enough to save time, but why routine shopping gives pleasurable experience. In my opinion, visiting a supermarket can be superior rather than online way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48122866894 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92139803969 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556313993174 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1500908802 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341548199384 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123372421357 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643737618442 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227604338533 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059137954235 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.