Some people say that in all level of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
• Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, education and getting high level of certification is one of the crucial subjects for students. Having enough sufficient practical experience inside the well certificate, can open lots of doors for every student. Some people think that, schools should change their plan and add some practical lesson for students in their schedule, while others believe that practical skills should teach when they graduate from university. This essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides and extend my partial support to the former view before arriving at conclusion.
Some educational centers believe that, students should just study theoretical subjects during the studying, due to this, they try to avoid student far from the practical skills and in their opinion, after graduation students have enough time to improve their hands-on training. Learning practical skills, moreover, shows people how they can earn money by their skills, hence students want to earn more money to fulfill their dreams, so it will be hard that they put their concentration on learning facts. Furthermore, whenever, some sciences or subjects not learn very well, trainers can not go to its practical issues, because when they faced with some problems during the practical lesson, the student can solve the problem who knows his/her theoretical lessons better than others. Not only can he/she find the best way to fulfill that problem, but also, they can reach to the best financial and timing result during the work. I mean that, they can anticipate the result of the project by analyzing the information that they have and decide that whether starting the project is worthy or not.
On the other hand, in my opinion, both learning facts and practical skills should progress in the same way. Because, science without experience can cause lots of financial and timing damage during the work, and students after graduation should pay more money from their own or their employee’s packet until to gain enough experience. In addition, if educational centers put the practical subject totally after the graduation, students meet some difficulties. For instance, students after the 25 years old want to reach some experience related to their education and this process usually may take 5 years, until they introduce with all angles of their work. In fact, they enter to the professional work world at 30 years old, therefore it is obvious that, the age of retired goes up to 60 years and the next generation can go to the work too late, which causes some problems for government. Today, moreover, companies recruit new workers who have well educational certification with enough experience and success CV. Students faced with numerous problems if they do not follow both theoretical and practical skills together during the school or university time, because they do not have the second part of education which called practical skills. It is a strong reason that student need to improve their practical skills inside the learning facts.
At the conclusion, I think that, science and experience can not be enough if they are alone. They can have a good result if they mixed with each other in the correct time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 805, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...better than others. Not only can he/she find the best way to fulfill that problem, b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i mean, i think, in addition, in fact, in my opinion, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2697.0 1615.20841683 167% => OK
No of words: 521.0 315.596192385 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17658349328 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55358104511 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491362763916 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0654147485 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.947368421 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4210526316 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.89473684211 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182333365158 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650296819093 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414688126166 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117369009943 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486478900931 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.