Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Learning is required to gain a basic understanding but gulping all the theories in order to get good marks in the exam won't do any good for you in your future life. I strongly believe that practical skills are far more superior than learning theories.
Firstly, The schools and Universities want to increase the number of students every year. Maybe that's the reason kids are being forced to learn the theories by heart and also not giving them required practical exposure related to the theory. In addition to this, it creates a fierce competition in school for example it has been observed that many young students learn some hard definitions without a better understanding so that they can secure good marks in the examination.
Secondly, Schools and Colleges are running in a marathon where they want to show the status of their institutes to parents by displaying a large banner board outside the school gate to shows the number of students who achieve a higher score.
However, Learning theories are required from school to college level because it's better to get acquainted with the basic fundamental idea and it's reason of origin and why it is still being used in the job market. Having all above without practical experience is neither going to work nor a feasible option for kid's growth.
In conclusion, I would like to say that school and colleges should not focus on increasing the counts of number of students and the status instead they should try to run some practical training programs related to theories class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...y believe that practical skills are far more superior than learning theories. Firstly, The scho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...he number of students every year. Maybe thats the reason kids are being forced to lea...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...banner board outside the school gate to shows the number of students who achieve a hi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55630095181 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580769230769 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7141338192 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.222222222 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5555555556 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193637129986 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769321988984 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275702562934 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101755408328 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391204663893 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.