Some people say that educational success most of the time depends on having a good teacher. Others say that student attitudes also do matters. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the aim to achieve the heights of success in the career ladder, one has to be attentive for educational knowledge. While some people perceive that educational success is dependent on a knowledgeable trainer, others are in consummate discord with it and argue that the attitude of pupils is a principal catalyst for this. I wholeheartedly concur with latter views because only focused students have the capability to follow what their teacher is trying to convey.
Firstly, to my perception, it is the attitudes of the students that enable them to achieve good educational grades. If a student is passionate about his studies, he would definitely do best in his studies and gain success. It can be illustrated by the less financially stable students, doing self-studies for engineering and medical entrance examinations most of the time, and coming first in the district even without the help of any teacher. On the contrary, there are many instances where students have access to best educators even though they fail to get the same grades as focused students. Besides, to achieve success in the field of education, all that students need to consider is their personal interest, self-control, and maximum time devoted to studies. Therefore, even the best trainers cannot help students without these qualities if they want to gain good educational grades.
On the other hand, there has been a growing body of opinion considering a great teacher to be responsible for the educational success of students. Mentors are mandatory not even for educational success, but in any other field where one wants to taste success under proper guidance and supervision. In this context, thorough research has been conducted by 'Harvard University' UK in 2016 using an online survey with a sample size of 1000 Canadian students and found that they did best in their education only because of their knowledgeable instructor. Also, they admitted that they see their instructor as their source of motivation, which is a must in the long-run process. Hence, what a teacher can do for his students in a short period of time using his expertise and immense knowledge makes him a contributing factor behind educational success.
As shown above, although the teacher's guidance and support play a prominent role in career success of pupils, I firmly opine that their attitudes are nonpareil factors behind their success. With that conviction, I would hand over the trophy of being a catalyst for educational success to students' attitudes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the best'.
Suggestion: to the best
...ny instances where students have access to best educators even though they fail to get ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 730, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...cher can do for his students in a short period of time using his expertise and immense knowled...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...uccess. As shown above, although the teachers guidance and support play a prominent r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as to, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17359413203 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85787591784 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533007334963 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.6839476176 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5625 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267298327986 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093867543902 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398701168827 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16736603395 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285481761277 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.