Whereas each nation has its own style of clothes, people tend to opt for the most suitable fashion from their own view. Consequently, some people argue that they can predict some information about a person's culture and character from their outfit. In this essay, I will illustrate why I agree with this opinion.
Every culture has its own costumes that distinguish it from the other ones. To clarify, If people travel from one country to another, they will obviously notice the conspicuous difference between the people's attire. For example, in Scotland, not only are women who can wear skirts, but men are also capable of wearing them too. Another example, Indians are well-known for their handmade hats that mainly contain a gemstone at its center. As a result of this, people can identify a person's culture easily by scanning his/her clothes.
Garments can reflect some details about a person's character as a kind of first impression. In other words, people can recognize if a person is tidy, clean, smart, careful, and rich from their apparel. For instance, there are some people who take care of the color of their own clothes and if they are homogenous or not, are very careful ones and they always worry about details. Others may tend to buy some luxurious outfits to show how wealthy they are. Hence, people's apparel can reveal some information about their characteristics.
In conclusion, people always use clothes to create an idea about the person in front of them. Therefore, due to the known differences between cultures and people's experience with the kinds of outfits, they can detect much data about a person's culture and character.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ey can predict some information about a persons culture and character from their outfit...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...rments can reflect some details about a persons character as a kind of first impression...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...h the kinds of outfits, they can detect much data about a persons culture and charac...
^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...fits, they can detect much data about a persons culture and character.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01449275362 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52497501864 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.624053839 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306631089357 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114096136003 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775684181218 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206464349382 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534164955141 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.