Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, and there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema
There is an ongoing debate of a film viewing since the turn of the century. Some argue that it is best experienced in a cinema hall whilst other support discard the necessity of it, I support the former. This essay will compare theatrical experience and also small screen watching along with relevant examples.
On the one hand, there is ample evidence that watching film at one’s own comfort is a preferred choice to many. The central reason for this is two fold, primarily, it can be paused and played at convenience. Not all can have the luxury to spare few hours to catch a movie at theatre. Secondly, its economical. Increase in the prices of tickets is forcing some population to confine themselves to home entertainment. To illustrate this, a recent survey from Oxford University states that for the cost of one theatre outing, an individual could get a subscription for 6 months for more than 5000 movies. Therefore it is conclusively clear that there not only is it convenient, but also cost effective.
On the other hand, although there is a case for tablets and phones being inexpensive source of watching, the experience that theatre provides cannot be understated. There are some films which are specifically shot suitable to technical attributes that are stand alone for movie halls. In addition to this, the sound system and the clarity of video is incomparable and is the defining factor. For example, film enthusiasts would pay any amount to watch certain movies such as interstellar and Avengers infinity war , which are loaded with high end visuals and graphics. Thus it is possible to state that theatres are still a undeniable choice to many.
In conclusion, despite both having their advantages and disadvantages, in my opinion, watching show reel on large screen is the best way to enjoy the film and cannot be substituted albeit even when available at a lesser price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n ongoing debate of a film viewing since the turn of the century. Some argue that...
^^
Line 2, column 602, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...for 6 months for more than 5000 movies. Therefore it is conclusively clear that there not...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: STAND_ALONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'standalone'?
Suggestion: standalone
...itable to technical attributes that are stand alone for movie halls. In addition to this, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s interstellar and Avengers infinity war , which are loaded with high end visuals ...
^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ded with high end visuals and graphics. Thus it is possible to state that theatres a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ssible to state that theatres are still a undeniable choice to many. In conclusi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94984326019 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7840908946 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617554858934 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9511470144 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156993471839 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436717455622 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452539788088 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922185844165 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227688087186 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.