According to some people, children should utilize their free time participating in organised group activities instead of being occupied with themselves. In my opinion, children learn a lot more skills such as leadership and teamwork when they get involved in group activities and they should utilize their spare time doing the same.
Firstly, It is often thought that children should learn to be with themselves and become independent as they might have to live alone in future and face hardships of life. As an illustration, my brother is dependent on my parents for food, clothing and shelter despite being capable himself. However, If children are left alone without supervision, they might end up devoting most of their time in playing video games instead of outdoor games which effect their eyesight adversely. According to a survey in North America, 60% of children under 5 years of age who play video games regularly require spectacles to see clearly.
However, children involved in outdoor group activities are considered to be active and healthy. Moreover, outdoor sports help children develop leadership skills which are beneficial to them when they grow old and start taking up jobs. For instance, most successful entrepreneurs were involved in outdoor sports activities during their childhood. Furthermore, group activities involves teamwork which teaches them an integral part of corporate work culture.
To conclude, advantages of taking up group activities overshadows the benefit of spending time alone. Therefore, parents should encourage their children to go out and participate in these activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.508 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81005338028 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8550318718 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331346406214 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128791296775 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797470693704 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222760320335 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635742361699 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.