Some people say that young people are much more influenced by their friends than their teachers or friends. Do you agree or disagree?
It is generally believed that friends and peers have more impact on youngsters than their guardians. From my perspective, children indeed get swayed by their fellows rather than their parents or teachers. In this essay, I shall discuss its causes, to strengthen my opinion.
To begin with, the busy lifestyle of adults has a major contribution to the increasing emotional distance between parents and their offspring. This is because, elders invest all the time working in offices, giving little or no time to their family and children. Consequently, whenever required, youngsters seek advice from their friends and get more attached to their companions. For example, a study by The Human Relations claims that during adolescence, about 68% of teenagers do not get family support and guidance and are more likely to get influenced by their peers.
In addition to this, the restrictions and lack of emotional involvement by the teachers make it obvious for students to get carried away by those who offer them care as well as emotional support. Moreover, people at a young age have similar sentiments. Therefore, understanding among friends is far better. To exemplify, the likes and dislikes in terms of fashion, movies, games, and other activities are common for an age group. Also, empirical observations show that parents sometimes could not realize the feelings of their offspring due to the generation gap and age difference.
To conclude, it is incontrovertible that youngsters are influenced more by their fellows than their elders because of the less involvement of their guardians in their life and emotions, and more concern and empathy shown by their confidants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to students'.
Suggestion: obvious to students
...nal involvement by the teachers make it obvious for students to get carried away by those who offer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28731343284 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91047407183 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.116136346 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335822914253 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108208660344 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876785619437 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203985398482 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596746517905 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.