Some people think that being creative in their free time is beneficial Discuss merits and demerits and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that being creative in their free time is beneficial. Discuss merits and demerits and give your opinion.

It is believed by a few individuals that many benefits are accrued from learning something new during leisure time. While this can result in numerous advantages, there certainly are some disadvantages, which will be discussed now. In my opinion, the pros outweigh the cons.

On the bright side, downtime is a great opportunity to upgrade skills and knowledge as well as relax. By participating in short courses and program endow people will unique skills and talents, which may be useful to them soon or later. For instance, learning a new language. The next benefit seems to be related to mental wellness. If someone is idlying for too long, they can become indolent and may lead to procrastination, which will impact their mind and later body. Looking at the same example of learning a foreign language, it will not only help to understand a new language but also in maintaining mental health. Therefore, more and more middle aged people appear to take up a second language to improve their memory.

Turning to the drawbacks of always being occupied even during off-work. Probably, consistently pushing to progress or being active can make people stressed instead of relaxing. Since they are incessantly busy, mind do not have enough time to rejuvinate and refresh. This may cause fatigue and insomnia in some cases. Another counter-effect can be in terms of money. People will not be able create savings since they are using all their sum to pay for activities. Some may as well take out loans to finance their expensive pastime. People may be forced to work harder to earn more, which possibly create a work-life imbalance.

To conclude, despite the fact that there exist some drawbacks to taking up activities after work, they are rare cases and can be easily overcome if managed effectively; therefore, the plus points overshadow the minus points. In my view, people should attempt to ensure that they do not do regrettable things that can cause damage to them.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in short, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99696969697 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67780902176 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1600220111 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.45 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18202581666 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534351644521 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319431738935 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11086347929 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450238502312 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.