Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned. Others, however, believe that people should be free to choose sports activities. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Should people be stopped from doing perilous sports? Or should they be free in pursuing their favorite exercise no matter if it is full of danger? These are the questions that many have been bombarded with for decades. Although it is stringently postulated by some that athletes have freedom of choice and shouldn’t be mandated to adopt sports that are safe, it will be proven by this essay that this may not be the case. In other words, the prohibition of dangerous ones will prevent sportspersons from hurting themselves. Throughout the following paragraphs, these points will be meticulously scrutinized to rationally advocate the latter logical standpoint.
It, on the one hand, is opined that forbidding people from doing hazardous sports can be considered as an interference in their personal lives since they are ceased from following their enjoyable activities. Take climbing during winter, as an illustration. Some are interested to go to mountains during this season to reap the benefits of snowy views although they may get stuck in avalanches. Doing so, they feel energetic and rejuvenated. It is, thus, exemplified by this example that people’s choice of sports is a personal matter and no one should meddle in it.
Risky exercises, on the other hand, should be forbidden since many opt for such activities as a source of excitement and are not aware of the dire consequences of their choices. Dreadful news about a 20-year-old mountain climber was circulated last year who went to Everest Mountain with a team during snowy weather, to illustrate. All of a sudden, they were trapped in an avalanche and lost their lives. If they were banned not to do such physical activity, they would have not lost their lives. By shedding light on this example, it is, thus, crystal clear that allowing people to do sports that may risk their lives is completely superficial because they are not well-informed about the detrimental effects of their decisions.
To recapitulate, after careful situational analysis, people ought to refrain from picking up sports that may cause them serious injuries even if they find it as a source of intrusion in their private lives. Based on the aforementioned compelling ground, it is, hence, hoped these points of paramount importance will be taken into account by sports federations the world over in the foreseeable future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, thus, well, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14211886305 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85961650216 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545219638243 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0673747235 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61111111111 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26353646839 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854579445606 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811851268203 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168746188265 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796536900677 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.