Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others believe individuals can also do some things to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The hazards in our environment are growing significantly and the overall situation is becoming out of control day by day. For this reason, some experts consider that large organizational bodies must take initiatives and individual level cannot do anything. However, some critics still believe, efforts should be taken from personal level. There are arguments on both sides, however, which we will discuss here.
On the one hand, it might be said that our environment is damaged in such a way that nobody can do anything alone effectively. For this reason, the large scale initiatives are to be taken involving governmental bodies. Furthermore, these kinds of giant activities requires lot of financial involvement which cannot be handled at individual level. For instance, for controlling the emmision of green house gases, government can implement laws strictly to different industrial sectors and can spend a lot of fund to resolve the drainage system related issues. No doubt that these major issues cannot be dealt by a single person.
Conversely, some people suggests that personal level awareness plays a pivotal role in managing the overall situation. Awareness can be started from individual level, and can be spread to national level. Therefore, from that point of view, each and every person can contribute a lot. In addition, participation at root level may not resolve the situation overnight, but consequences can be minimized. For example, at our level, we can stop littering and encourage dumping waste material to the right places. At the same time, we can reduce the usage the polyethylene bags while shopping and can support using biodegradable fibre-based shopping bags. Altogether, these can contribute to resolve environmental problems, albeit in small scale.
All things considered, we are almost on the brink of irreversible damage to the mother nature. Personally, I believe a cooperational approach from both personal and national level can be made to redress the balance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39171974522 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9571036928 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6585874363 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0555555556 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192861456139 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613714863747 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036421781987 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116579868319 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262751789035 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.