Of late, environmental concerns such as pollution and deforestation have been increased profoundly and no country is an exception to it. It has opened a new door for a debate that, citizens from all the nations can aid in reducing the contamination, while others believe that actions from individuals might be of less useful. In my opinion, even small precautions from inhabitants could make a huge difference in the quality of the environment.
To embark upon, emission of toxic gases from industries cannot be obsolete by people as they are not controlled by them. Furthermore, waste products from chemical factories have been released into the water bodies which results in water poising. On top of this, day by day the needs of land to construct more accommodations and roads have mushroomed and as a result of this phenomenon, the regime has no option other than cutting the trees. Thus, these issues have to be addressed by organizations and government authorities rather than natives.
On the other hand, individuals can do their job in protecting nature from impurity. Firstly, by opting for either carpooling or public transportation to commute, dwellers can reduce not only carbon dioxide levels in the air but also in reducing traffic consumption. Secondly, everyone can plant a few saplings at home even in apartments. This way it would be helpful to improve the greenery as well as fresh air in the atmosphere.
To conclude, few concerns such as hazardous emissions from manufacturing units should be taken care of by both bureaucrats and business owners. Nonetheless, taking different measures by public namely reducing the usage of own transportation and planting more trees could help in improving the environment more livelihoods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23758865248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0810787274 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652482269504 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.734026972 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128293928188 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425476897138 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444494484052 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737797158969 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043707482145 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.