Some people think the government should support artists like painters, musicians, and poets, while others believe this wastes money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some people believe that the artists should be sponsored by the government, the others think that supporting them is waste of money. In this essay, I will discuss both the arguments and express my view with the relevant examples.
To commence with, few artists are God-gifted. They have unbelievable talent which can be mesmerizing. If such arts are not show cased, it will be unworthy. Funding artists like painters, musicians and poets can help them to reach and perform on international platform. It is a kind of a services to the public. For instance, the Chief Minister of Mumbai city holds an audition for incoming stream of participants every year. Besides, another reason to help them is to help the nation and promote the cultural heritage. For example, the dance art and the poetries are recognized worldwide which keeps civilians to touch their roots. Finally, the legend artists return to the country in some or the other way.
On the other hand, it is true that few think that supporting such people can be waste of money if it is not beneficial for their own country. This is because, spending on an individual sometimes prove useless compared to the public welfare. Instead, they can look after social issues such as poverty, development, education. Moreover, the state should decide cautiously as it is the taxes filed by citizens. For instance, the centralized money is invested in production for some event only for a day. Furthermore, these responsibilities might affect the economy.
In my opinion, I moderately agree to the latter argument, as this is an utter waste of funds on an individual. Instead, the government should limit the quota to art holders as private sectors already invests on them for a business purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...form on international platform. It is a kind of a services to the public. For instance, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a service' or simply 'services'?
Suggestion: a service; services
...international platform. It is a kind of a services to the public. For instance, the Chief ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01706484642 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77149497657 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5055279106 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3684210526 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4210526316 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282203646406 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700638948108 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101413600381 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18934878925 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135540576728 0.056905535591 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.