Some people think governments should spend money on measures to save languages with few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Languages are a significant part of a nation which not only serves as a medium to communicate but is also the basis of many local traditions. While some people support that the authorities should take some measures to protect the languages by allocating financial resources, other oppose the notion on the basis that it can be put to better use. This essay will discuss both the viewpoints before finally giving a personal opinion.
To begin with, languages should be protected for a number of reasons. Language are a vital part of the culture, without which the history of a nation would be lost. Several traditions and forms of art based on would not have the same beauty in any other language as it reflects in their original form. For example, the folklore sung in Bengali language conveys the struggles of our forefathers who fought for the language. This would not appear as melodious in English compared to when sung in the native language. Therefore, government should invest a certain amount of fund to protect the language.
However, most peoplebelieve that the financial resources can be used in many other sectors rather than wasting them in saving dialects. It is prevalent that there are many social issues that the government must address in order to eradicate them. For instance, more schools are need for the growing number of students, the potholes in the roads must be mended for comfortable conveyance, strict measures must be taken against growing crimes like domestic violence and murder etc. This will contribute to the development and growth of the society.
To recapitulate, although it is essential to address the various issues of the society to improve their standard of living, protecting the language is equally essential to maintain the ethnicity of the nations culture. Hence, I believe government must allocate funds in a certain ratio that help resolve both issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... the viewpoints before finally giving a personal opinion. To begin with, languages should be pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ected for a number of reasons. Language are a vital part of the culture, without wh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06687898089 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68308085551 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563694267516 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3963249875 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191884528777 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624035335778 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507799071109 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110741034219 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602925231365 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.