Some people think an international car-free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution. Others think there are more effective ways to do it?
Discuss both sides and give your opinion?
It is argued by some masses that the best way to curb air pollution is having an international car-free day. While, few others think that there are numerous other options available, rather than observing such kind of day. Moreover, they believe that it is practically impossible to have this keeping in mind various unavoidable factors. From my perspective, I personally believe that we have a plethora of strategies, despite prohibiting cars on roads that can be implemented at governmental level to prevent this outspread pollution.
To embark with, having a road free of vehicles for a single day will reduce pollution by a good percentage, definitely. That is why many individuals in society believe to have a car-free day at the international level. They think that having such an occasion will not only reduce environmental contamination but it will also save a lot of fuel, which is used to run all vehicles around the world. In this way, it will benefit both, an environment as well as our oil reserves, being retained for future generations to come. Moreover, most of the people will prefer walking to their respective locations, as a result, it involves effective health benefits. For example, Aalborg, an industrial city in Denmark, observes May 1st as a car-free day and prohibits vehicles on roads using non-renewable sources of energy.
However, there are a handful of people in society, who have contradictory views. They believe that putting a ban on cars for one day is practically impossible on factors like medical emergency, time management, et cetera. They suggest that there are many other factors to minimize pollution like introducing an odd-even method, which allows even-numbered license plates on even dates and odd-numbered license plates on odd dates. Moreover, another possible way as per them is to implement a complete ban on diesel engines that have crossed 10 years in running. For example, in 2017, in the capital city of India, local authorities there announced odd-even rule for 10 days to handle the further contamination of air quality, and as a result, they were able to reduce pollution levels by 25% in one single day.
To sum up, pollution and its negative effects on the environment have become a global issue. However, few communities around the world opine to have a global car-free day while a few others suggest to undertake some important factors and focus on other solutions to smother it. I reckon that there are multiple other ways despite having an absolute car-free day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...y, it will benefit both, an environment as well as our oil reserves, being retained for fu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 22, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...es of energy. However, there are a handful of people in society, who have contradi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 811, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lution levels by 25% in one single day. To sum up, pollution and its negative ef...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 191, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest undertaking'.
Suggestion: suggest undertaking
... global car-free day while a few others suggest to undertake some important factors and focus on oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, i reckon, kind of, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09832134293 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90168262084 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4311308941 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28407118603 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949187031161 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765490043138 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183970073445 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520735535753 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.