Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Friendship has always been an influential factor for an individual's personality development. While some people opine that having peers with same thought process is ideal, others believe that it is better to have friends who oppose their opinion. This essay will discuss both these views in detail; and provide evidence on why I prefer friendship where there is conflict of interest.

Peers with same mind-set are considered to be good bonding by many people. The reason for believing this is because these friends understand each other deeply, which in turn allows them to provide psychological support to each other in every situation. For example, introverts always hang-out with trusted confidants who understand their emotional status and stands by them, even if they hardly express their feeling. Thus, friends with same thinking-process bonds with each other well.

Conversely, there are people who argue that it is better to have friends with different opinion than them. This kind of bonding not only makes a person stronger, but also improves one's personality through healthy debates with friends. One such instance is that, if a colleague at work is a good companion too, then that friend will be able to critique regarding areas of improvement in a person's professional and personal life. These healthy criticism contributes largely to a person's development as a whole. Hence, having peers with opposite ideology is ideal for a person's character building.

In conclusion, although there are people who prefer friends with opinion, I personally support the opposite view who believe that it is better to have peers who disagree with them. I support this notion because, this type of friendship has a greater influence in nourishing one's behavioural pattern.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...lways been an influential factor for an individuals personality development. While some peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...y people. The reason for believing this is because these friends understand each other dee...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...es a person stronger, but also improves ones personality through healthy debates wit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...lthy criticism contributes largely to a persons growth. Hence, having peers with opposi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s with opposite ideology is ideal for a persons character building. In conclusion, a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, regarding, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35689045936 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78119035495 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3566827673 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460593674221 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162164708206 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172593012116 0.0667982634062 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296336560537 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832238307747 0.056905535591 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.