Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent.
Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
It is believed by many that, young adults should be taught to be a good parent and this education should start from schools. I disagree with this statement that educational institutes are responsible for teaching parenthood and child-rearing. Parenting is a process of promoting a child physically and mentally.
School’s priority is to teach the academic subjects rather than the parental role. Even though academics is to create a better future generation, and parenting is the part of their future role, it does not fetch them a job or financial stability which are most important for a successful future.
Another reason is that teenagers might not have the maturity to understand the responsibilities of a parent. To understand what is taught in class they themselves have to connect with such conditions which in their current situation may not be able to because they themselves are growing up. Teaching parenting to a child is not advisable.
Furthermore, the skills needed to become a good father or mother is developed from understanding and adopting. Child-rearing involves caring, protection, understanding etc. In other words, a child needs parental support both physically and mentally. Parents need to give their children a good education, food, better healthcare and relaxed life, for this financial stability of parents is most important. Better education will ensure better human being with advanced life skills which is the most important factor for child-rearing.
To conclude, schools should concentrate on academic subjects and develop better and financially future generation. This will, in turn, create a better future parent who can support their offspring in a better way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45864661654 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06038128851 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556390977444 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1735515745 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269554113448 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943548955895 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613085592716 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14950001734 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834632717641 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.