Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, modern technology is making individual more sociable is thought by some demographics; however, others think it is making them less sociable. I completely disagree with the above said notion.
People, today, not like to spend too much time with their family and friends to talk with them face to face. They would like to spend their entire day chatting with close one through numerous applications such as Instagram, Whatsapp and Facebook. Owing to this, they are not giving them so much importance to their personal issues. Consequently, sometimes when they need their time to spend with they ignore them and always just try to connect via internet applications. For instance, one of my friend who recently met with accident, who barely need their elder brother to support him physically in this time. But his brother just send him text messages and upload status to pray for him always busy on his cell phone all the time rather than assist physically and mentally.
On the contrary side, it helps to communicate with each other on world-wide via modern technology. This technology provides various websites such as Skpye to talk via video calling. By using this technology, we can now see them. Therefore, Family members and friends who are living in another country are help to keep in touch with near ones. If we have are not aware with this technology then how we talk to them who are living far from our. For example, a survey conducted by Cambridge University that nowadays, 85 % parents allowed their children to study abroad because they thought they can keep in touch by using of modern applications.
In conclusion, while modern technology made people busy and introvert, it helps to keep in touch with each other all the time than previous time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e help to keep in touch with near ones. If we have are not aware with this technol...
^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...eep in touch with near ones. If we have are not aware with this technology then how...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54602273014 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580536912752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.69998635 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161191930713 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596168338871 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115498381315 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15296846287 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141671487688 0.056905535591 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.