There are separate ideas about the fundamental purpose of museums. Some people believe that museums should entertain young individuals by providing a joyful and entertainment environment. In contrast, others reckon the primary, and merely goal of museums should be educational approaches. In the essay below, I will examine both views and give my personal perspective.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that museums are a rich and invaluable treasure for education purposes. There are a wide variety of museums, such as archeological museums, which is by far the most common and critical types of museums, historical, science and technology, and art and gallery museums. It means museums are a radical (original) and crucial source of knowledge and education. Furthermore, these pieces of art and treasures can provide accurate and reliable knowledge and experience visually. It is proven that any books or short video documentary cannot convey information such ways museums can. Because it enables visitors to roam around the museum and see, feel, and even read comprehensively regarding what has occurred in the previous eras in historical museums and what is happening in the extraordinary and admirable world of technologies in scientific ones.
On the other hand, museums can be considered one of the most beneficial and instructive sorts of recreational activities. A number of marvelous and inspiring exhibitions in diverse subjects are held in museums worldwide, annually. Besides, these golden and valuable environments are the best and the most distinguished places to bring families and friends together to visit and spend such quality and joyful time together.
To sum up, although people attend museums with different aims, it can be educational and research achievements or spending quality and a good time as leisure and pastime activity. I am convinced that museums are the most appropriate atmosphere and centers for fulfilling both tendencies and demands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lfilling both tendencies and demands.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, regarding, so, in contrast, no doubt, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 10.4138276553 298% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45928338762 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05262998068 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605863192182 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4325598587 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30952684769 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958207124964 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811333605532 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195377097123 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117155718745 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.