Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to higher positions.
Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples.
In the contemporary epoch, there is a heated argument over the issue that long time employees should promote to higher position for the betterment of the company. A lion's share of the society favours it. However, the rest goes adverse it. I completely agree with this notion. In my opinion, staffs who work or long time should not only give higher ranks but also give good incentives. The following paragraph's would explain about the trend along with an apt example.
I see eye to eye, with the central idea for various reasons. First and foremost, Older employees are often loyal to an organization. Therefore,company should always take good care of them. For example, staffs who working 15 years and more in company, can promote to managerial place and better incentives such as 2-3 times bonus, a good foreign tour etc. As a result, they can play a more active role and this can bring more profit and fame to the company. Furthermore, employees are those person who can make a company hell or heaven. Therefore, for growth and keep place in market company should take better care of their. thus, company also can take care for their family and children's education.
On the flip side of the coin, some critic go against the above discussed assertions. just because of someone spend 10 or more years in an organization, it does not means they are more part. sometimes new employee deliver better performance then senior employees, because they have better knowledge and skills. For instance employees who spent years in same place in other company would also have better knowledge and ability, so they can also be perfect for promotion in higher ranks.
To conclude, in my opinion, employers should consider a variety of factors while determining an employee’s eligibility for promotion. this includes their qualifications, special skills and domain expertise. promotions and rises encourage employees to work harder. If they are denied promotion in spite of their hard work and eligibility, they might just quit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , company
...ften loyal to an organization. Therefore,company should always take good care of them. F...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this person' or 'those people', 'those persons'?
Suggestion: this person; those people; those persons
...the company. Furthermore, employees are those person who can make a company hell or heaven. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...mpany should take better care of their. thus, company also can take care for their f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r their family and childrens education. On the flip side of the coin, some criti...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...against the above discussed assertions. just because of someone spend 10 or more yea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...e years in an organization, it does not means they are more part. sometimes new emplo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sometimes
..., it does not means they are more part. sometimes new employee deliver better performance...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...loyee's eligibility for promotion. this includes their qualifications, special ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Promotions
...s, special skills and domain expertise. promotions and rises encourage employees to work h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and eligibility, they might just quit.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07462686567 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71911625862 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585074626866 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7176241664 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2727272727 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2272727273 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258084632997 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069556303097 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862115252219 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159424814158 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747030142655 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.